User: Password:
   Keep me logged in.
Register  |  I forgot my password
Statistics
  • Active Links: 66
  • Pending Links: 0
  • Todays Links: 0
  • Active Articles: 7
  • Pending Articles: 2
  • Todays Articles: 2
  • Total Categories: 16
  • Sub Categories: 49
Latest articles
Top 10 Web Directories
What are the best values for top 10 web directories online in 2012? Panda Updates, algorithm updates, and new arrivals factor into the top 10 equation. What are the top 10 and why are they the best value?

Top 10 List- Building a Successful Web Directory
What are the top web directories doing differently than the average ones? Learn effective strategies for building a great web directory.

How Do You Structure a Web Directory?
Tips on building an effective web directory, taking current search algorithms, SEO, and link building into consideration.

Best Web Directories
How do I find the best web directories? What makes a good website directory? Top 10 list.

Google Panda Update
How Google's Panda Updates and current algorithm is shaping the search results today.

Web DirectoryArticle Details

Best Web Directories

Date Added: August 23, 2011 11:42:10 PM
Author: Greg
Category: Directories

What are some of the factors at which to look when deciding to submit your website to a web directory? Below is a starting point (not an all-inclusive list) and highlights 10 significant points which distinguish superb web directories from many other web directory sites.

  1. Does the web directory accept virtually any website which is submitted? If there is not careful editorial discretion in weeding out the “subpar” sites, you probably don’t want your site in that directory. If the editor is rejecting sites which do not have a high level of good content, this may be a directory to consider a site submission.
  2. Is the cost of the web directory submission for “review” or evaluation, or is the fee for an automatic listing?
  3. Does the web directory appear to promote the listed websites, or does it seem like the site is trying to sell Page Rank? Does the directory sell links in the sidebar and/or footers of the homepage? Not a good sign of a clean web directory.
  4. Does the web directory have fresh, relevant, and related content, which would be helpful to a person searching for a product or service online?
  5. How long has the web directory been in existence? 5-10 years of existence shows a reasonable consistency, and may indicate that the site will continue in its present form in the future.
  6. Keyword Placement. How does the web directory place for specific keywords? Presumably, a good web directory should place reasonably well for the keywords “web directory.” Interestingly, with millions of web directory sites online, these keywords are extremely difficult to capture in terms of search engine results; the top 200 sites may be worth evaluating. Also, how does the site place for its own domain name? If it has trouble placing for keywords of the website name, beware, it may have been manually penalized by Google.
  7. MOZ Rank. SEOMOZ has established itself as an authoritative website analytic program. Page Authority and Domain Authority are the applicable measuring basis. Scores range from 0-100, the higher score being the better one. I look for web directory sites which have a Domain and/or Page Authority score of 60 and higher. SEOMOZ combines many on and off site factors into their algorithm, and appears to conduct a thorough evaluation. Scores are updated monthly.
  8. Alexa Score. Again, another gauge of how a site is performing. The statistics of Alexa may not be perfect, but they represent as specific a measurement of website traffic which is generally available. Any directory which is in the top 100,000 websites in terms of visitor traffic may be a site to consider.
  9. Who links to the web directory? If the web directory owner is promoting his site in credible and trustworthy web directories, this is a good sign. If the directory is promoted by spam blog posts and questionable web directories, beware.
  10. Page Rank. OK, I know I am not supposed to care about this topic. What can I say? I still think that it plays a role in determining whether a web directory is an effective tool to promote your site. (Remember, we are promoting websites, not buying Page Rank.) Although Page Rank may not be deemed to as important as it once was, it is still a factor I consider. Google manually reviewed and punished many web directory sites over the past five years, and one gauge of their “penalty” may be measured by a low web directory Page Rank. I am always leery of promoting a site on an older web directory which only has a PR of 0 or 1. Something doesn’t seem right about a directory which has been online for years, without a PR of at least 2 or 3.

 

Comments

No Comments Yet.


You must be logged in to leave a Comment.
Latest links
Latest article comments
Jan 31: The Editor said on Top 10 Web Directories
Check out the new article about the top ten best web directories!

Dec 26: The Editor said on Google Panda Update
It's 2011 year end, and Matt Cutts has given SEOs a bit of a breather, indicating that there will be no further Panda updates until 2012. In the meantime, this gives web directory editors a chance to evaluate the good and bad of their sites, do a little housecleaning, and commit to even better content for their directory users. 2012 promises to bring even more change to the SEO landscape, so be prepared for the unexpected, and stay on the road less traveled, the White Hat Expressway.

Nov 23: The Editor said on Google Panda Update
November, 2011's Pubcon in Las Vegas was extremely eventful. Matt Cutts and Amit Singhal from Google spoke about the continued relevancy of search, as well as algorithm issues. Fresh content appears to be a substantial factor in Google's results, with less relevancy placed elsewhere. This is good news to webmasters who continue to develop new and unique content in their directories, rather than minimal new content. Word is that the Panda updates will be continued on a regular basis, to weed out the inferior content, and emphasize content which appears to meet search parameters. Thus, low bounce rate continues to be important in the SERPS. The Spam Team at Google continue to develop their algorithm, with the goal of removing low-quality sites from the SERPS. Time will tell if Google continues to meet their users' needs, or if Yahoo/Bing continue to grab more market share of "Search."

Nov 02: The Editor said on Google Panda Update
Google Panda Updates continue to keep SEO professionals on their toes. Next week's Pubcon event in Las Vegas may provide what we have been waiting for- a bit of insight to the SEO industry. Matt Cutts, who has substantial influence on the Google search algorithm, is scheduled as a keynote speaker on November 9, 2011, and usually provides helpful guidance at this event about what Google likes and doesn't like in their search results.

Aug 10: The Editor said on Google Panda Update
The Google Panda Update, also known as the Farmer Update, is due to return, again, by the end of August, 2011, if its past schedule remains consistent. Many webmasters, anticipating Panda's return, are taking a more proactive approach with their sites, carefully screening and adjusting on-page site components, link structure, and content. It goes without saying, that the Panda Updates have made many webmasters uncomfortable, since Panda has impacted websites previously thought to be trustworthy in Google's eyes. I think for web directories, the Panda Updates may be outcome determinative. For example, many online services submit duplicate articles to hundreds of web directories at once. Duplicate content was a negative consideration before Panda. It appears to be an even more significant issue today. I think that Web Directory editors should be especially cautious in accepting any articles which have authors unknown or not deemed reliable by the editor. Careless editors may cause the needless destruction of their web directories, for Google's purpose (and thus the online community's purpose). I think it is especially important that web directory editors focus on adding relevant websites which are useful to the users of the site. This creates an inherent conflict for editors, who accept marginal sites in the directory because they depend on income from their directory. Again, I think that strict care should be applied to any websites considered for the directory. Finally, I think it is important for editors to provide useful and new content to the web directory, to enhance the usability of the users, and allow the users to spend more productive time on the web directory site. Web users are eager the share a valuable site with friends, family, etc. Thus, the more widespread use of the web directory, I believe that Google will deem this to be a positive factor towards the future updates.